Meaningfull content and discussion of current events welcome. No Trolls allowed.
George Cliton blames Arafat for failue
Published on November 11, 2004 By mgosh In Current Events
I read Clinton’s biography a few months ago and I agreed with what he said about the blame in the failure of peace in Israel. The Palistian leadership had the chance to truly make peace with Israel provided that he would give up the right of return for the refugees. Israel naturally balked at the very idea of inviting back into ITS country the Palistian people, we are talking numbers that exceed your population. It is the equivalent of the U.S. inviting 400 Million Muslims and then have them vote and elect their own leadership. That is the problem, Israel is a democracy and having a new population that exceeds the Jewish People in pure numbers will destroy your country.

Isn't the purpose of giving the Palestian people their own country the purpose of negotiation? The right of return should of been the right to return to Palistian that is created from the agreements, not the right to return to Israel. How would that possibly be agreeable to Israel forcing them to accept a population of 24 million that greatly exceeds YOUR population of 6 million.

In conclusion the blame rests on Arafat when he not only refused the agreement, he refused to NEGOTIATE about it. A year later under Ariel Sharon's government Arafat accepted the peace accord. "Arafat's watch was wound 15 minutes too late" That quote is from Bill Clinton.


Comments
on Sep 12, 2005
It's really not about the Palestinians getting a place to call home. They want all Jews dead. Period. Crying about having their own country was just jargon for "we want what the Jews have and we want them dead for having it."

There can never be peace. There will never be peace. Why doesn't the world just accept it and let the fight ensue instead of putting off the inevitable with all the TALKING. Winner take all.

on Sep 12, 2005
As much as I would love for there to be peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians, I doubt it will happen. The Pals don't want peace. They want Israel to be gone. Period.

I sometimes think that if Gaza becomes Palestinian, and they continue to fire mortars into Israel, as the separate nation now which is what they "fought" for, Israel can consider it to be an act of war, and respond accordingly. Before, when Israel was the "occupier" then it was just deemed as oppression, even though we all know that it was both retaliatory and defensive.

Pals got what they wanted. Now, they better show some effort at peace. The ball's in their court.